Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 10:36:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C01110826E4F06552879D0B5BFB37F60192D07D6A16F32D91E92306673D9250A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Daily Mail has been criticised for its unreliability, its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate scare stories, and for instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement. In February 2017, Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a reliable source. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/wikipedia-editors-ban-daily-mail-source-citation-unreliable-mail-online-a7570856.html https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/wikipedia-daily-mail-generally-unreliable.html https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/05/19/daily-mail-jimmy-wales-fake-news-wikipedia-wikitribune.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766767662640623995
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C01110826E4F06552879D0B5BFB37F60192D07D6A16F32D91E92306673D9250A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710066990551
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1766767662640623995C01110826E4F06552879D0B5BFB37F60192D07D6A16F32D91E92306673D9250A