Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 10:20:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Daily Mail has been criticised for its unreliability, its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate scare stories, and for instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement. In February 2017, Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a reliable source. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/wikipedia-editors-ban-daily-mail-source-citation-unreliable-mail-online-a7570856.html https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/wikipedia-daily-mail-generally-unreliable.html https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/05/19/daily-mail-jimmy-wales-fake-news-wikipedia-wikitribune.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766767662640623995
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710066057919
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17667676626406239959E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A