Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 10:00:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07D230ED4272B6107B5F76DB42B0A0EB36E9C227BADC35048192E3BE5FE2AA60
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Daily Mail has been criticised for its unreliability, its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate scare stories, and for instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement. In February 2017, Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a reliable source. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/wikipedia-editors-ban-daily-mail-source-citation-unreliable-mail-online-a7570856.html https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/wikipedia-daily-mail-generally-unreliable.html https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/05/19/daily-mail-jimmy-wales-fake-news-wikipedia-wikitribune.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766762744915648975
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07D230ED4272B6107B5F76DB42B0A0EB36E9C227BADC35048192E3BE5FE2AA60
  • createdAtMillis - 1710064838733
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176676274491564897507D230ED4272B6107B5F76DB42B0A0EB36E9C227BADC35048192E3BE5FE2AA60