Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 21:22:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E7CD3ED4EEE84A0F37BD9476968BDA7157FA204DD4A21BDA69BACFCFFC52958
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to what is suggested here, no part of the forest containing particularly old trees is cleared. Majority of areas selected for construction were areas that had coniferous trees that were used for forestry purposes or that were damaged by storm damage or bark beetles. https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2024/01/25/hessen-nein-im-reinhardswald-werden-keine-120-000-baeume-fuer-windraeder-gefaellt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766555745493958931
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E7CD3ED4EEE84A0F37BD9476968BDA7157FA204DD4A21BDA69BACFCFFC52958
  • createdAtMillis - 1710019363933
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17665557454939589310E7CD3ED4EEE84A0F37BD9476968BDA7157FA204DD4A21BDA69BACFCFFC52958