Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 20:44:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1635E94D977825AC1F29313BF57D39F794ABA656A7691C7C141C5B68EBDEF400
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note essentially confirms the OP to be factual, and then argues over the term "many". OP expresses an opinion in the use of that term. If you want to argue over the statistical percentage and if that qualifies as "many", do it as a comment. NNN https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1766520576850460910
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1635E94D977825AC1F29313BF57D39F794ABA656A7691C7C141C5B68EBDEF400
createdAtMillis - 1710017092159
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17665205768504609101635E94D977825AC1F29313BF57D39F794ABA656A7691C7C141C5B68EBDEF400