Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 08:32:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07F59B0C8FFC247E89C1EF4581534B428B38E29FF23F85D37C5023868C776FE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is in contempt of court and could prejudice the future trial of the person charged. None of these details have been released and are likely to be grossly inaccurate. In addition, the person posting does not even reside in the UK. https://news.npcc.police.uk/releases/npcc-response-to-anonymity-decision-on-firearms-officer

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766381319515181470
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07F59B0C8FFC247E89C1EF4581534B428B38E29FF23F85D37C5023868C776FE1
  • createdAtMillis - 1709973158535
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176638131951518147007F59B0C8FFC247E89C1EF4581534B428B38E29FF23F85D37C5023868C776FE1