Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 09:02:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F95A6F4DEC23A02DD2FDEF7188FCEDFC97C8BD11DA13BE26EB18AC50757B47A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Requirements of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 are not met. Post is factual and doesn't express an opinion on the outcome of the trial. It is possible that s.5 of the act applies permitting discussion of public affairs The officer has been named publicly by a judge. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court-reporting-restrictions-and-restrictions-public-access-hearings https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68502539.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766352480261005804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F95A6F4DEC23A02DD2FDEF7188FCEDFC97C8BD11DA13BE26EB18AC50757B47A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1709974940115
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1766352480261005804F95A6F4DEC23A02DD2FDEF7188FCEDFC97C8BD11DA13BE26EB18AC50757B47A4