Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 10:38:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97F54D536291322D13FDF71FC85419332BE78AB788ED26CF78D1FAB111072622
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Requirements of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 are not met. Post is factual and doesn't express an opinion on the outcome of the trial. It is possible that s.5 of the act applies permitting discussion of public affairs The officer has been named publicly by a judge. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court-reporting-restrictions-and-restrictions-public-access-hearings https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68502539.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766352480261005804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97F54D536291322D13FDF71FC85419332BE78AB788ED26CF78D1FAB111072622
  • createdAtMillis - 1709980683237
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176635248026100580497F54D536291322D13FDF71FC85419332BE78AB788ED26CF78D1FAB111072622