Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-09 08:27:07 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 01FF3E860796552F34762D7F475AC1B8F039149AAA50976434B5FDAB672DCC9E
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN Requirements of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 are not met. Post is factual and doesn't express an opinion on the outcome of the trial. It is possible that s.5 of the act applies permitting discussion of public affairs The officer has been named publicly by a judge. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/contempt-court-reporting-restrictions-and-restrictions-public-access-hearings https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68502539.amp
All Note Details