Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-08 21:28:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Not misleading. The post simply states that there were complaints about the dog's appearance at the Oscar luncheon and that he is not attending the Oscars. https://twitter.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1766111148158423493?t=b5ywwCI97x8OIAFL1k2kKw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766136448980275496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32
  • createdAtMillis - 1709933318940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176613644898027549686D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32