Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-08 16:30:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8969AFE298CE1D47C0F27FEF4EAE4BDC92318DD125AD300B434B63E01CC2AB23
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not true because I have no proof is called appeal to ignorance logical fallacy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766130343818784792
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8969AFE298CE1D47C0F27FEF4EAE4BDC92318DD125AD300B434B63E01CC2AB23
  • createdAtMillis - 1709915409738
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17661303438187847928969AFE298CE1D47C0F27FEF4EAE4BDC92318DD125AD300B434B63E01CC2AB23