Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-08 17:24:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D52B7C00BC940C3E7E3C6C6BEA646EE4B46A66A441FC6588F51BA2296B6A32A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not true because I have no proof is called appeal to ignorance logical fallacy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766130343818784792
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D52B7C00BC940C3E7E3C6C6BEA646EE4B46A66A441FC6588F51BA2296B6A32A
  • createdAtMillis - 1709918654957
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17661303438187847920D52B7C00BC940C3E7E3C6C6BEA646EE4B46A66A441FC6588F51BA2296B6A32A