Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-08 14:41:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B70E64624A96544D6FFDAE9AE552A37F9971E2C40AEF4ADA0084D5EB14471DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked paper is a preprint, and has not been subjected to any kind of fact checking or peer review. Peer review is an important step to establish factual accuracy and veracity — an unreviewed study is just a claim. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303816v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766107800512426093
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B70E64624A96544D6FFDAE9AE552A37F9971E2C40AEF4ADA0084D5EB14471DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1709908915374
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17661078005124260935B70E64624A96544D6FFDAE9AE552A37F9971E2C40AEF4ADA0084D5EB14471DC