Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 00:09:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E03E03BEDBFDFA63D5443F980CB4D70D2F8E78BD7DE4EC08AAA2DBC67BA9D0DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lt. der Gegenpartei wurde eine einzige Aussage im Zusammenhang mit einer jüdischen Influencerin untersagt. Die Aussage "alle eingereichten Unterlassungsanträgen" wirkt irreführend, insbesondere im Fall Shurjoka vs. KuchenTV. https://twitter.com/TobiasHuch/status/1765776000711864353?t=3ZCWfOC3NKTuQ3qwMa1x2w&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766095363004342398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E03E03BEDBFDFA63D5443F980CB4D70D2F8E78BD7DE4EC08AAA2DBC67BA9D0DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1709942948050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1766095363004342398E03E03BEDBFDFA63D5443F980CB4D70D2F8E78BD7DE4EC08AAA2DBC67BA9D0DD