Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-08 15:06:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42942E1E7E3BBCD9FC270299BF740D270D783402D8615511DC2EE3477C07621B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lt. der Gegenpartei wurde eine einzige Aussage im Zusammenhang mit einer jüdischen Influencerin untersagt. Die Aussage "alle eingereichten Unterlassungsanträgen" wirkt irreführend, insbesondere im Fall Shurjoka vs. KuchenTV. https://twitter.com/TobiasHuch/status/1765776000711864353?t=3ZCWfOC3NKTuQ3qwMa1x2w&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766095363004342398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42942E1E7E3BBCD9FC270299BF740D270D783402D8615511DC2EE3477C07621B
  • createdAtMillis - 1709910416771
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176609536300434239842942E1E7E3BBCD9FC270299BF740D270D783402D8615511DC2EE3477C07621B