Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-08 11:59:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FBCABA58BCB65A532BE5BE7D98F23C9E8A1474049AB26CE982B0899F37469E37
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading post and article. Fact is this area is 0.1% of the permanent forest, the balance of co2 released from cutting down and long term saving has been taken into account. https://s4f--kassel-de.translate.goog/materialien/faktensammlung-windenergieanlagen-reinhardswald/?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766063489095750112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FBCABA58BCB65A532BE5BE7D98F23C9E8A1474049AB26CE982B0899F37469E37
  • createdAtMillis - 1709899178727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1766063489095750112FBCABA58BCB65A532BE5BE7D98F23C9E8A1474049AB26CE982B0899F37469E37