Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 02:51:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A15AFF5840CE315D4E1624BE01FBF034C42537F23988E313A7FA7F0F62FDD0F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading post and article. Fact is this area is 0.1% of the permanent forest, the balance of co2 released from cutting down and long term saving has been taken into account. https://s4f--kassel-de.translate.goog/materialien/faktensammlung-windenergieanlagen-reinhardswald/?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766063489095750112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A15AFF5840CE315D4E1624BE01FBF034C42537F23988E313A7FA7F0F62FDD0F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1709952690533
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1766063489095750112A15AFF5840CE315D4E1624BE01FBF034C42537F23988E313A7FA7F0F62FDD0F4