Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 07:55:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading post and article. Fact is this area is 0.1% of the permanent forest, the balance of co2 released from cutting down and long term saving has been taken into account. https://s4f--kassel-de.translate.goog/materialien/faktensammlung-windenergieanlagen-reinhardswald/?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1766063489095750112
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 66F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10
createdAtMillis - 1709970944281
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 176606348909575011266F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10