Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 01:46:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61839AE59426ABB5665E2AC96D01ADE0E2F85CFE5E329DDDAB92229F62D28224
Participant Details

Original Note:

None of this jewellery was bought at the taxpayers' expense. Even if Jagmeet Singh bought his wife's jewellery, his salary is his money and not taxpayers. This is as absurd as claiming that anything a public servant buys for themselves with their own money is a taxpayer expense https://gprivate.com/647jc

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765949051193725300
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61839AE59426ABB5665E2AC96D01ADE0E2F85CFE5E329DDDAB92229F62D28224
  • createdAtMillis - 1709948766111
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176594905119372530061839AE59426ABB5665E2AC96D01ADE0E2F85CFE5E329DDDAB92229F62D28224