Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-08 03:23:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86F42E35BA610093937E7FDA329728E75A525F927A03310C0C445E202D6C157E
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Limiting our role to interpreting the existing words in a statute and letting the Legislature decide changes is one of the basic teachings of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Dobbs.” — A quote from the court’s ruling. The Dobbs’ case was cited 14 times. https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/4b56014daa6dda84/a039b1d9-full.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765934538209833235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86F42E35BA610093937E7FDA329728E75A525F927A03310C0C445E202D6C157E
  • createdAtMillis - 1709868220779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176593453820983323586F42E35BA610093937E7FDA329728E75A525F927A03310C0C445E202D6C157E