Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 17:13:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D878D74F7F2F58DC58278530A8BD4C0DCCF5D08655F10EAB1FE29E2FD07258D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whatever way we may feel about the community that created and propagated the message, the proposed note defers to ad hominem reasoning and perhaps guilt by association. Although this is par for the course, criticizing the message itself (which is possible here) is much healthier.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765784863032971391
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D878D74F7F2F58DC58278530A8BD4C0DCCF5D08655F10EAB1FE29E2FD07258D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1709831624980
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1765784863032971391D878D74F7F2F58DC58278530A8BD4C0DCCF5D08655F10EAB1FE29E2FD07258D1