Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-07 14:11:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D428CBD3FB6374D38E84AD2B74E3EB94ACA87A9FDE9CD4166E5B0EDFFDAD53B4
Participant Details
Original Note:
Re. the Forstater ruling, read the rest of paragraph 104: "The Tribunal correctly acknowledged, ..that calling a trans woman a man “may” be unlawful harassment. However, it erred in concluding that that possibility deprived her of the right to do so in any situation" https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf
All Note Details