Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 09:17:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re. the Forstater ruling, read the rest of paragraph 104: "The Tribunal correctly acknowledged, ..that calling a trans woman a man “may” be unlawful harassment. However, it erred in concluding that that possibility deprived her of the right to do so in any situation" https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765651992888644029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
  • createdAtMillis - 1709803035218
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176565199288864402930B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578