Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 22:21:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re. the Forstater ruling, read the rest of paragraph 104: "The Tribunal correctly acknowledged, ..that calling a trans woman a man “may” be unlawful harassment. However, it erred in concluding that that possibility deprived her of the right to do so in any situation" https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765651992888644029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1709850095682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17656519928886440291C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC