Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 07:25:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1185EA25AAF780C0041FFDA5BE585B41E3E8DDACF86802E1020994449E26D581
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the Forstater ruling did judge gender critical views to be protected, it specifically stated that it did "not mean that those with gender-critical beliefs can misgender trans persons with impunity" and that trans people still have protection from harassment. (see page 4) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf#page55

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765596469736640873
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1185EA25AAF780C0041FFDA5BE585B41E3E8DDACF86802E1020994449E26D581
  • createdAtMillis - 1709796333650
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17655964697366408731185EA25AAF780C0041FFDA5BE585B41E3E8DDACF86802E1020994449E26D581