Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 19:50:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE5D3265C6A036A881B21E9B4AA62062FA2CE74CA03CAF2942D8988612742AB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The fact that the post references her past employer is incidental to the content of the post. If she had been fired from the BBC and is now disreputable then it might be relevant, but she wasn't.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765415411703496945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE5D3265C6A036A881B21E9B4AA62062FA2CE74CA03CAF2942D8988612742AB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1709754617009
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1765415411703496945FE5D3265C6A036A881B21E9B4AA62062FA2CE74CA03CAF2942D8988612742AB6