Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 18:25:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The fact that the post references her past employer is incidental to the content of the post. If she had been fired from the BBC and is now disreputable then it might be relevant, but she wasn't.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765415411703496945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF
  • createdAtMillis - 1709749513568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176541541170349694561C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF