Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 15:03:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61660EAE7F7530272701FA33E8CB4A772904F97E08573FFEB8F7EC728349F25F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The fact that the post references her past employer is incidental to the content of the post. If she had been fired from the BBC and is now disreputable then it might be relevant, but she wasn't.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765415411703496945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61660EAE7F7530272701FA33E8CB4A772904F97E08573FFEB8F7EC728349F25F
  • createdAtMillis - 1710255809647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176541541170349694561660EAE7F7530272701FA33E8CB4A772904F97E08573FFEB8F7EC728349F25F