Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 00:04:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E5F40A6F0B304EEBBCD1E08D301D3A0FE10C4FAE4B0AACBC1E336E8FD317DEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The fact that the post references her past employer is incidental to the content of the post. If she had been fired from the BBC and is now disreputable then it might be relevant, but she wasn't.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765415411703496945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E5F40A6F0B304EEBBCD1E08D301D3A0FE10C4FAE4B0AACBC1E336E8FD317DEF
  • createdAtMillis - 1709769857536
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17654154117034969455E5F40A6F0B304EEBBCD1E08D301D3A0FE10C4FAE4B0AACBC1E336E8FD317DEF