Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 19:42:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75C29504432A55C7D23C07C0346F095D78AD42BE331A80E4A26E25B7E5A3AC21
Participant Details

Original Note:

The shown graph does not support this affirmation. The paper authors state: “The dominance of female users of Goodreads is a potential source of bias, because it seems likely that a higher proportion of female book readers use Goodreads.” Font: https://wlv.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/2436/620363/Reviewer%20genre%20and%20gender%20in%20Goodreads%20R1%20-%20NO%20TC.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765398785549570395
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75C29504432A55C7D23C07C0346F095D78AD42BE331A80E4A26E25B7E5A3AC21
  • createdAtMillis - 1709754122603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176539878554957039575C29504432A55C7D23C07C0346F095D78AD42BE331A80E4A26E25B7E5A3AC21