Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 14:56:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vorsicht Fake: PrognosUmfragen ist kein seriöses Umfrageinstitut. https://www.br.de/nachrichten/netzwelt/experten-warnen-vor-verbreitung-der-zahlen-von-prognosumfragen-faktenfuchs,TrWzunh https://www.prognos.com/de/twitter-account-prognosumfragen-distanzierung https://www.presseportal.de/pm/133833/4333731

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765387067112948058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1709736962439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1765387067112948058FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3