Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 16:29:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3A92C3D4B2BFD1F3889A780F6567F9DC51DCC14CFD4EFD26E683C198F4AA26E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vorsicht Fake: PrognosUmfragen ist kein seriöses Umfrageinstitut. https://www.br.de/nachrichten/netzwelt/experten-warnen-vor-verbreitung-der-zahlen-von-prognosumfragen-faktenfuchs,TrWzunh https://www.prognos.com/de/twitter-account-prognosumfragen-distanzierung https://www.presseportal.de/pm/133833/4333731

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765387067112948058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3A92C3D4B2BFD1F3889A780F6567F9DC51DCC14CFD4EFD26E683C198F4AA26E
  • createdAtMillis - 1709742599324
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1765387067112948058E3A92C3D4B2BFD1F3889A780F6567F9DC51DCC14CFD4EFD26E683C198F4AA26E