Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 07:11:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3F86D211435897733EE04DFD4184388F20C3CAA634E889A5D2039B0D0843854
Participant Details

Original Note:

El Daily Mail está considerado una fuente no confiable, criticado por su poca fiabilidad, su sensacionalismo -en especial en asuntos científicos-, plagiarismo y derechos de copyright. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail/ https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2016/04/what-it-s-fall-victim-mail-online-s-aggregation-machine

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765270658613731652
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3F86D211435897733EE04DFD4184388F20C3CAA634E889A5D2039B0D0843854
  • createdAtMillis - 1709709073939
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1765270658613731652B3F86D211435897733EE04DFD4184388F20C3CAA634E889A5D2039B0D0843854