Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 07:21:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82AFD08056C8C3EB57BC772C448DD6CDDD11A02672B89578AB1B0C60E388DA1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

El Daily Mail está considerado una fuente no confiable, criticado por su poca fiabilidad, su sensacionalismo -en especial en asuntos científicos-, plagiarismo y derechos de copyright. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail/ https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2016/04/what-it-s-fall-victim-mail-online-s-aggregation-machine

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765270658613731652
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82AFD08056C8C3EB57BC772C448DD6CDDD11A02672B89578AB1B0C60E388DA1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1709709700833
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176527065861373165282AFD08056C8C3EB57BC772C448DD6CDDD11A02672B89578AB1B0C60E388DA1C