Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 07:03:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90AB3A4A4AE4D20223527F29BFA8844EE444918B19C671BE02BDB94D2BF492F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es ist keine Bemerkung notwendig. Er stellt hier lediglich sachlich die Absurdität des fiktiven Gesprächs mit einem toten Philosophen dar. Meinungen dazu gehören in die Kommentare und nicht in die kollektiven Anmerkungen.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765147392075067681
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90AB3A4A4AE4D20223527F29BFA8844EE444918B19C671BE02BDB94D2BF492F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1709708580643
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176514739207506768190AB3A4A4AE4D20223527F29BFA8844EE444918B19C671BE02BDB94D2BF492F5