Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 04:30:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3DC7348D187D727E77C51DD12D982E47C8435D72B03B23E717C196CF398E00F
Participant Details

Original Note:

A plain reading of the definition provided by Viva Frei confirms that neither Jena's disappointment in the Supreme Court's decision nor her opinion on the matter qualify her, by definition, as an insurrectionist. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title18-section2383&num=0&edition=1999

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765093989227667479
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3DC7348D187D727E77C51DD12D982E47C8435D72B03B23E717C196CF398E00F
  • createdAtMillis - 1709699423173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1765093989227667479D3DC7348D187D727E77C51DD12D982E47C8435D72B03B23E717C196CF398E00F