Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 21:20:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88B1935111E51B930AA9F2770C2D78D8B322B3B12D69B6560F0406522389AC9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No es necesaria la nota de la comunidad ya que el articulo de Animal Político habla de datos de la página web, pero lo que se publicó fue un documento PDF de propuestas. Son cosas completamente diferentes y el contenido no es el mismo. Antes de publicar hay que revisar. https://claudiasheinbaumpardo.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CSP100.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1765079469969317971
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 88B1935111E51B930AA9F2770C2D78D8B322B3B12D69B6560F0406522389AC9C
createdAtMillis - 1709673658766
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 176507946996931797188B1935111E51B930AA9F2770C2D78D8B322B3B12D69B6560F0406522389AC9C