Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 21:19:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FB72CC6E06D9C49815AAB96E1FFBFC6ED6D8F6B60CBFAB7FFCD34F5044F4DE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No es necesaria la nota de la comunidad ya que el articulo de Animal Político habla de datos de la página web, pero lo que se publicó fue un documento PDF de propuestas. Son cosas completamente diferentes y el contenido no es el mismo. Antes de publicar hay que revisar. https://claudiasheinbaumpardo.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CSP100.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1765079469969317971
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4FB72CC6E06D9C49815AAB96E1FFBFC6ED6D8F6B60CBFAB7FFCD34F5044F4DE9
createdAtMillis - 1709673547818
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17650794699693179714FB72CC6E06D9C49815AAB96E1FFBFC6ED6D8F6B60CBFAB7FFCD34F5044F4DE9