Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 17:36:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F07930B058A8316D88FF42F3F63580EBF0D7C5E03C9195E972AF8CE675B8D1E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both photographs are digitally altered, and therefore cannot be used for the purpose of molistic processing; a technique employed by forensic facial examiners in criminal investigations, rather than social media contributors. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/acp.3975

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1765061170418032849
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F07930B058A8316D88FF42F3F63580EBF0D7C5E03C9195E972AF8CE675B8D1E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1709660201404
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1765061170418032849F07930B058A8316D88FF42F3F63580EBF0D7C5E03C9195E972AF8CE675B8D1E0