Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-06 03:58:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note 1764222349317128565 cites a result of public-open AI checker, but its reliability is far from 100%. Not a high-quality source. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/02/turnitin-ai-cheating-detector-accuracy/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764846385969648107
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42
  • createdAtMillis - 1709697504252
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764846385969648107D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42