Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-05 07:08:04 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D65F7AEEB89E7C3290A3C59F7E17D8002432D7E7FFAA632B464BCAEE1ACFD8B4
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN. New subsequent studies suggest that the Shroud could be around 2 000 years old, not merely 700. https://www.ncregister.com/interview/new-scientific-technique-dates-shroud-of-turin-to-around-the-time-of-christ-s-death-and-resurrection https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/cataniaEng.pdf https://sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648.j.ija.20210902.11 https://bereanarchive.org/articles/history/shroud-of-turin-carbon-dating The C-14 dating (1988) remains contentious due to sample issues, as confirmed by the head of chemical research of the OG project team. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/17/the-1m-challenge-if-the-turin-shroud-is-a-forgery-show-how-it-was-done https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin#Criticisms_of_the_test_results https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180605112057.htm https://phys.org/news/2019-07-shroud-turin.html https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/652977 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/archaeology-today/radiocarbon-dating/
All Note Details