Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 05:03:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEA4A2C5C5AA5D79492322BB46FABED39DCDDB01F4E4400CF3BBA05186B2D08A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note needed. Yall clearly see what this "opinion" trying to convey, he is clearly trying to make the story as if the ruling was made by a single judge (in a very racist way btw). Also, you zealots, none of the notes have any opinion in them, all have sources for them :)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764782401245389170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EEA4A2C5C5AA5D79492322BB46FABED39DCDDB01F4E4400CF3BBA05186B2D08A
  • createdAtMillis - 1709615015044
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764782401245389170EEA4A2C5C5AA5D79492322BB46FABED39DCDDB01F4E4400CF3BBA05186B2D08A