Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 10:54:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B748636D5FCC08F203C1685575B7838F2D4F2BD887903580F12E18B6269A7717
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court case in question was the hunt's appeal against a "Community Protection Notice". The notice was withdrawn in a secret deal with the police, so it is still very dodgy, but not as bad as the tweet suggests. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVJEfdwnAlc

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764766557576532428
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B748636D5FCC08F203C1685575B7838F2D4F2BD887903580F12E18B6269A7717
  • createdAtMillis - 1709636077750
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1764766557576532428B748636D5FCC08F203C1685575B7838F2D4F2BD887903580F12E18B6269A7717