Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 23:48:40 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6D47A1D74CF8D152C6AB018DFC8E9C324EAC68783C170E7A0D3B07FCDBD23F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling had nothing to do with determining if January 6th was or was not an insurrection; only with whether or not a state could bar someone from appearing on a ballot for a federal office. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-supreme-court-ruling-allowing-donald-trump-on-to-the-2024-presidential-ballot

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764755251364565181
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6D47A1D74CF8D152C6AB018DFC8E9C324EAC68783C170E7A0D3B07FCDBD23F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1709596120554
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764755251364565181F6D47A1D74CF8D152C6AB018DFC8E9C324EAC68783C170E7A0D3B07FCDBD23F6