Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 03:38:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31ECF828E0F1B08239FC1DCD338BB91AE2D5690BEA8E45CFB3C026702D581010
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling had nothing to do with determining if January 6th was or was not an insurrection; only with whether or not a state could bar someone from appearing on a ballot for a federal office. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-supreme-court-ruling-allowing-donald-trump-on-to-the-2024-presidential-ballot

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764755251364565181
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31ECF828E0F1B08239FC1DCD338BB91AE2D5690BEA8E45CFB3C026702D581010
  • createdAtMillis - 1709609926065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176475525136456518131ECF828E0F1B08239FC1DCD338BB91AE2D5690BEA8E45CFB3C026702D581010