Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 20:54:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DDA1B9AC5DE72613BFC2B06DBA7E0408251FE5F0FD5B3AE9B76E160C670CCD6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The image of the decision in the post has been altered and does not accurately represent the actual decision made by the Supreme Court on the case. The actual document can be found by following the link below. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/23

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764750072284139846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8DDA1B9AC5DE72613BFC2B06DBA7E0408251FE5F0FD5B3AE9B76E160C670CCD6
  • createdAtMillis - 1709585658898
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17647500722841398468DDA1B9AC5DE72613BFC2B06DBA7E0408251FE5F0FD5B3AE9B76E160C670CCD6