Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 21:42:43 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 212D21AB6C192B78D8A735E10F45966D171A4F2F2F2F97116E61F6C7A682CCCF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The image of the decision in the post has been altered and does not accurately represent the actual decision made by the Supreme Court on the case. The actual document can be found by following the link below. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/23

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764750072284139846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 212D21AB6C192B78D8A735E10F45966D171A4F2F2F2F97116E61F6C7A682CCCF
  • createdAtMillis - 1709588563715
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1764750072284139846212D21AB6C192B78D8A735E10F45966D171A4F2F2F2F97116E61F6C7A682CCCF