Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 07:22:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9AC51672A7B9CD94619E641FD37C3C6414E34877D70F947975D64124D8C32CA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clauser is not a climate scientist. Vast majority of those disagree with him. "Clauser, who has never published a peer-reviewed paper on climate change..." "John Clauser and his ilk ignore this [facts] because they are not advancing serious scientific critiques..." https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/11/16/john-clauser-nobel-climate-denial/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764722076978425933
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9AC51672A7B9CD94619E641FD37C3C6414E34877D70F947975D64124D8C32CA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1709623345040
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17647220769784259339AC51672A7B9CD94619E641FD37C3C6414E34877D70F947975D64124D8C32CA4