Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 15:25:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF3C540EF0CB5CBE39030349444AF7E6FFD5073B996D9B43B27A9DEB98E30317
Participant Details

Original Note:

Your objection to the community note is entirely irrelevant, as the note already answered this. The link provided (https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e065687) states that this is without the presence of the illness itself, while the note says that you are more likely to get it from the illness.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764600249161851385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF3C540EF0CB5CBE39030349444AF7E6FFD5073B996D9B43B27A9DEB98E30317
  • createdAtMillis - 1709565928647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764600249161851385CF3C540EF0CB5CBE39030349444AF7E6FFD5073B996D9B43B27A9DEB98E30317