Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 20:08:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5047B17D2F0B1624B0EB5504CF5628DC96446BF8A7EA96293399E155DB4BBA8A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Your objection to the community note is entirely irrelevant, as the note already answered this. The link provided (https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/6/e065687) states that this is without the presence of the illness itself, while the note says that you are more likely to get it from the illness.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764600249161851385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5047B17D2F0B1624B0EB5504CF5628DC96446BF8A7EA96293399E155DB4BBA8A
  • createdAtMillis - 1709582883190
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17646002491618513855047B17D2F0B1624B0EB5504CF5628DC96446BF8A7EA96293399E155DB4BBA8A